Strategi Pemasok dalam Mempertahankan Agen dan Distributor B2B: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis mengenai Kepercayaan, Nilai Hubungan dan Pembelian Ulang

Authors

  • Widodo Kemalmadakara Universitas PGRI Yogjakarta Author
  • Arif Siaha Widodo Universitas PGRI Yogjakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62710/d4bp6n84

Keywords:

Agen dan Distributor, Kepercayaan, Nilai Hubungan, Retensi, Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis

Abstract

Pemasok yang menjangkau pasar melalui agen dan distributor bergantung pada kesediaan perantara untuk terus membeli dan memasarkan produknya, namun strategi pemasok yang mempertahankan perantara belum disintesis secara sistematis. Tinjauan ini bertujuan memetakan keadaan penelitian, mengidentifikasi strategi pemasok yang membentuk trust dan relationship value, menjelaskan mekanisme yang menghubungkannya dengan retensi, dan menyusun model konseptual yang dapat diuji. Prosedur mengikuti PRISMA 2020. Penelusuran pada 28 September 2026 menjaring 241 rekaman basis data dan 34 rekaman dari metode lain untuk rentang terbit 2015–2026, dan menghasilkan corpus final 11 artikel dari delapan negara. Literatur ini tipis dan terfragmentasi: sembilan dari sebelas studi berupa survei potong-lintang, tidak ada eksperimen, hampir setengah corpus tidak menyatakan landasan teori, dan hanya dua studi yang mengukur trust dan relationship value sekaligus. Sintesis menghasilkan empat tema: komunikasi dan interaksi sebagai jalan menuju trust, kualitas penawaran dan keadilan sebagai jalan menuju nilai, integrasi kedua rute, serta ketergantungan sebagai kondisi batas. Dukungan dan insentif kanal serta kapabilitas digital pemasok tidak diteliti oleh satu studi pun. Tinjauan ini mengusulkan Model Retensi Perantara Rute Ganda beserta dua belas proposisi berlabel kekuatan dukungan: empat kuat, satu sedang, lima lemah, dan dua eksploratif. Rute nilai, yang bekerja terutama melalui kepuasan, didukung langsung oleh studi distributor, sedangkan rute trust sejauh ini terutama didukung oleh studi pelanggan bisnis. Karena itu, pengujian rute trust pada agen dan distributor, khususnya dalam distribusi berjenjang di Indonesia, menjadi prioritas riset.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amoako, G. K., Adams, G. B., & Doe, J. K. (2020). Intention to continue relationship in B to B setting – Case of Guinness Ghana Breweries – Some preliminary findings. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 27(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2020.1713563

Bianchi, C., & Abu Saleh, M. (2020). Investigating SME importer–foreign supplier relationship trust and commitment. Journal of Business Research, 119, 572–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.023

Claro, D. P., Xue, J., Hong, A., Palmatier, R. W., & Wang, Y. (2025). Channel governance effectiveness and country contingencies: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53, 1748–1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01110-8

Gansser, O. A., Boßow-Thies, S., & Krol, B. (2021). Creating trust and commitment in B2B services. Industrial Marketing Management, 97, 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.07.005

Geiger, I., & Naacke, D. (2023). "What's it really worth?" A meta-analysis of customer-perceived relationship value in B2B markets. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(4), 751–773. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-09-2021-0438

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O'Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Panie, A. N., & Premananto, G. C. (2026). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in B2B relationships: A systematic review of relational and digital drivers. Journal of Management and Digital Business, 6(2), 1309–1322. https://doi.org/10.53088/jmdb.v6i2.3042

Paul, J., & Rosado-Serrano, A. (2019). Gradual internationalization vs born-global/international new venture models: A review and research agenda. International Marketing Review, 36(6), 830–851. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280

Ho, T. P., & Tran, V. K. (2020). Factors affecting the quality of manufacturer–distributor relationship in the plastic industry in Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Economics and Business Administration, 10(2), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.10.2.583.2020

Pires, P. B., Ribeiro, Â., & Santos, J. D. (2026). Dual pathways to commitment: Communication, salesperson behaviour, and the re-specification of the commitment–trust model in mature technical B2B markets. Administrative Sciences, 16(6), 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16060270

Schaefers, T., Hülsebusch, D., & Cziehso, G. (2025). "Come and visit us!": The effects of factory tour participation on customers. Industrial Marketing Management, 125, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.01.004

Shamsollahi, A., Chmielewski-Raimondo, D. A., Bell, S. J., & Kachouie, R. (2021). Buyer–supplier relationship dynamics: A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(2), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00743-1

Sharma, N. (2022). How core, technical and social components of business relationship value drive customer satisfaction and loyalty in high tech B2B market. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2020-0554

Skarmeas, D., Saridakis, C., & Leonidou, C. N. (2018). Examining relationship value in cross-border business relationships: A comparison between correlational and configurational approaches. Journal of Business Research, 89, 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.039

Sulistyorini, E., Irawanto, D. W., & Rahayu, M. (2018). Antecedents of retailer trust on supplier to create long term relationship. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 16(3), 387. https://jurnaljam.ub.ac.id/index.php/jam/article/view/1317

Tedja, B., Al Musadieq, M., Kusumawati, A., & Yulianto, E. (2024). Systematic literature review using PRISMA: Exploring the influence of service quality and perceived value on satisfaction and intention to continue relationship. Future Business Journal, 10, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00326-4

Tedja, B., Al Musadieq, M., Yulianto, E., & Kusumawati, A. (2024). Sustaining success in B2B partnerships: Exploring intention to continue the relationship. Sustainability, 16(10), 4211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104211

Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006a). Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business-to-business relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3/4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610648075

Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006b). Value-based differentiation in business relationships: Gaining and sustaining key supplier status. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.119

Wieland, D. A. C., & Ivens, B. S. (2025). Not quite alike: Supplier relationship management in B2B marketing and supply chain literature. Industrial Marketing Management, 126, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.02.004

Zietsman, M. L., Mostert, P., & Svensson, G. (2023). Precursors and outcomes of perceived value in B2B banking services: A nomological framework. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 22(4), 330–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2023.2234812

Published

12-10-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kemalmadakara, W., & Widodo, A. S. (2026). Strategi Pemasok dalam Mempertahankan Agen dan Distributor B2B: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis mengenai Kepercayaan, Nilai Hubungan dan Pembelian Ulang. PENG: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 3(4), 2478-2492. https://doi.org/10.62710/d4bp6n84