Paradoks Kebijakan Arak Bali: Pelestarian Budaya dan Pengendalian Dampak Negatif

Authors

  • Anak Agung Istri Wulan Kharisma Mahadewi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Studi Global, Universitas Budi Luhur Author
  • Nadia Utami Larasati Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Studi Global, Universitas Budi Luhur Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62710/ty08jw98

Keywords:

arak Bali; public policy; social control; social control theory; cultural criminology.

Abstract

Arak Bali is an intangible cultural heritage with religious, social, and economic significance for Balinese society, yet it is also vulnerable to misuse as a recreational alcoholic beverage. Bali Governor Regulation Number 1 of 2020 was enacted to protect Balinese traditional fermented and distilled beverages while controlling their negative impacts. This study aims to analyze the policy paradox and the mechanisms for controlling the negative impacts of arak Bali through the perspective of Travis Hirschi’s Social Control Theory. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed using in-depth interviews with five key informants, supported by participatory observation and literature review. The findings reveal that the regulation has strengthened legal protection and increased the economic value of arak Bali for local artisans, but has also encouraged a shift in its meaning from a sacred ritual object to a commercial commodity. The negative impacts are controlled through formal mechanisms involving government and law enforcement agencies, and informal mechanisms through traditional villages, banjar, pecalang, and awig-awig. The study concludes that policy effectiveness depends on the synergy between formal regulation and culture-based social control in Balinese society.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisy, N. E., & Wardana, D. J. (2024). Aspek Hukum Penerapan Pergub Bali Nomer 1 Tahun 2020 Terhadap Legalisasi Arak Bali Bagi Masyarakat. UNES Law Review, 7(2), 732–740.

Atmaja, I. W. Y., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2024). Tinjauan Kriminologis Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Minuman Beralkohol Oleh Anak Di Kabupaten Bangli. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 5(1), 69–75.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hagan, F. E., & Daigle, L. E. (2021). Introduction to criminology: Theories, methods, and criminal behavior (11th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Karuniawan, I. M. P., Noak, P. A., & Erviantono, T. (2025). Kebijakan legalisasi Arak Bali: Implementasi dan dampak terhadap perajin arak tradisional di Desa Tri Eka Buana, Sidemen.

Nugroho, R. (2021). Kebijakan publik: Formulasi, implementasi, dan evaluasi.

Nugroho, R. (2024). Kebijakan publik dan partisipasi masyarakat.

Subawa, I. B. G. (2024). Agama Hindu dan Budaya Bali: Warisan Luhur dalam Kehidupan Modern. Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 7(4), 104–113.

Sugiarta, I. W. A., Sulandari, S., & Suargita, I. N. (2022). Implementasi Pengaturan Arak Bali Dalam Peraturan Gubernur Bali Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Tentang Tata Kelola Minuman Fermentasi dan/atau Destilasi Khas Bali. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 7(1), 53–59.

Sumarja, I. M., & Jayanti, I. G. N. (2023). Arak Sebagai Fermentasi Minuman Lokal dan Fungsi Kultural Bagi Masyarakat Bali: Perspektif Sosio-Historis. Dharmasmrti: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Dan Kebudayaan, 23(2), 146–158.

Wibawa, S., & Putu, I. (2023). Buku Eksistensi Arak Bali.

Wijaya, P. Y. (2022). Eksistensi Arak Bali: Sebuah Polemik.

Wiramatika, I. G., & Sumardani, R. (2025). Keberadaan Arak dalam Kehidupan Sosial Budaya Masyarakat Bali dan Pariwisata Sebagai Alkohol Tradisional. Journal of Tourism and Interdiciplinary Studies, 5(1), 165–179.

Published

2026-07-29 — Updated on 2026-07-29

Versions

How to Cite

Mahadewi, A. A. I. W. K. ., & Larasati, N. U. . (2026). Paradoks Kebijakan Arak Bali: Pelestarian Budaya dan Pengendalian Dampak Negatif. Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian, 3(2), 5010-5022. https://doi.org/10.62710/ty08jw98