Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen Pengguna Kosmetik dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Melalui Platform Tiktok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/ba7bg924Keywords:
Consumer Protection; Social Commerce; Legal Liability; TikTok Shop; Online Dispute Resolution (ODR).Abstract
This study is motivated by the high vulnerability of consumers in cosmetic transactions on TikTok Shop due to a mismatch between existing regulations and the impulsive, algorithm-driven nature of social commerce. The research addresses the effectiveness of legal protection, the distribution of responsibility among platforms, sellers, and influencers, and weaknesses in dispute resolution mechanisms. The study aims to critically examine regulatory gaps and propose policy recommendations responsive to digital developments. Using a normative legal research method, the study analyzes legislation on consumer protection, electronic transactions, and cosmetic supervision. Findings reveal three main issues: current regulations do not accommodate content- and algorithm-based transactions; legal responsibilities of platforms and influencers remain unclear, creating accountability gaps; and internal and external dispute resolution mechanisms are ineffective, leading to high underreporting by consumers. The novelty lies in a holistic analysis of responsibility distribution within the social commerce ecosystem and the integration of algorithmic due diligence and a hierarchical Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) model. The study concludes that consumer protection in social commerce requires a hybrid regulatory approach emphasizing compliance-by-design for platforms, clear legal accountability for influencers, and the development of an integrated ODR system with enforceable authority to ensure effective consumer redress.
Downloads
References
Badan POM RI. (2018a). Pengawasan kosmetik. BPOM RI.
Badan POM RI. (2018b). Pengawasan kosmetik di Indonesia. BPOM RI.
Busch, C. (2016). Online dispute resolution for consumers. Journal of Consumer Policy, 39(1), 1-21.
Busch, C. (2017). European consumer law. Intersentia.
Calo, R. (2014). Digital market manipulation. George Washington Law Review, 82, 995-1051.
Calo, R. (2021). Platforms and the law. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
De Francesco, F. (2020). Influencer marketing and consumer protection. European Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 1-18.
Helberger, N. (2020). Governing algorithms: A digital consumer perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105-123.
Helberger, N. (2021). Digital consumer law. Oxford University Press.
Hensel, L. (2020). Trust and risk in social commerce. Information Systems Journal, 30(3), 1-29.
Howells, G. (2005). The rise of online consumer protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(1), 1-19.
Kaptein, M. (2015). The effectiveness of ethics programs: Compliance by design. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 415-431.
Kementerian Perdagangan RI. (2023). Evaluasi regulasi PPMSE di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Perdagangan.
Lianos, I. (2019). Competition law for the digital era: Platforms, algorithms, and consumer protection. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 8(1), 1-10.
Nasution, B. J. (2021). Hukum perlindungan konsumen digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 28(2), 145-162.
OECD. (2016). Consumer policy and enforcement. OECD Publishing.
Patel, M., & Patel, N. (2019). Exploring research methodology. International Journal of Research and Review, 6(3), 48-55.
Prasetyo, T. (2022). Tanggung jawab platform e-commerce terhadap konsumen. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 11(1), 45-63.
Putri, A. R. (2022). Social commerce dan tantangan perlindungan konsumen digital. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), 321-340.
Putri, D. A. (2021). Influencer marketing dan perlindungan konsumen digital. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 180-198.
Rahmawati, S. (2020). Pengawasan BPOM terhadap peredaran kosmetik online. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(4), 489-505.
Sari, I. (2022). Efektivitas UUPK dalam transaksi digital. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(1), 75-92.
Sari, I. P., Novita, A., Al-Khowarizmi, A., Ramadhani, F., & Satria, A. (2024). Pemanfaatan Internet of Things (IoT) pada bidang pertanian menggunakan Arduino UnoR3. Blend Sains Jurnal Teknik, 2(4), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.56211/blendsains.v2i4.505
Sutikno, B. (2023). Perlindungan konsumen dalam transaksi TikTok Shop. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 30(2), 250-270.
Utami, L. (2021). Efektivitas BPSK dalam penyelesaian sengketa konsumen. Jurnal Hukum Acara, 4(1), 77-98.
Wanadri, R. R., Soraya, I., & Pratiwi, C. Y. (2025). Strategi komunikasi pemasaran CV. Rintis Usaha Bersama melalui media e-commerce dalam meningkatkan penjualan produk. Studi Administrasi Publik dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.62383/studi.v2i2.218
Zhang, K. (2021). Social commerce and consumer vulnerability. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(3), 1-24.
Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism and consumer autonomy. Journal of Information Technology, 34(1), 75-89.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anna Maria Wijaya, Ferry Irawan Febriansyah, Azis Akbar Ramadhan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








