Efektivitas Penerapan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No. 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pelaksanaan Panggilan dan Pemberitahuan Melalui Surat Tercatat: Studi Pengadilan Agama Donggala
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/chejgh94Keywords:
Legal Effectiveness; SEMA No. 1 of 2023; Summons and Notification; Donggala Religious Court;Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness and the supporting or inhibiting factors of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 1 of 2023 regarding summons via registered mail at the Donggala Religious Court Class IB. This empirical juridical research uses a qualitative descriptive design. Data were gathered through observation, documentation, and interviews with judges, registrars, advocates, and litigants. The results show that the normative standing of SEMA No. 1 of 2023 is effective as an internally binding policy. It successfully accelerates case management, reduces court costs, and increases administrative transparency through digital tracking. Supporting factors include explicit administrative guidelines, cost efficiency, and robust institutional cooperation with the postal service. Inhibiting factors consist of inaccurate party addresses, geographical obstacles, and low digital or administrative literacy among the rural public. Overall, this policy successfully modernizes judicial administration, though continuous technical coordination and broader public socialization remain essential to maintain procedural justice.
Downloads
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Perihal Undang-Undang. Rajawali Pers.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Hamdani, A. (2024). Reaktualisasi hukum acara perdata Islam di era siber: Tantangan otentisitas saksi pada persidangan hibrida. Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Keluarga, 12(1), 45–61.
Hidayat, R., & Kusuma, W. (2025). Aspek psikososial masyarakat rural terhadap digitalisasi peradilan agama: Studi kasus sengketa misaqan ghalizan. Jurnal Hukum Perdata Kontemporer, 6(2), 112–128.
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Pelaksanaan Panggilan dan Pemberitahuan Melalui Surat Tercatat.
Mertokusumo, S. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyadi, L. (2021). Peradilan Elektronik (E-Court) di Indonesia. Alumni.
Nasution, S. (2024). Mengurai problematika digital divide pada implementasi e-court di wilayah Indonesia timur. Jurnal Keadilan Sosial dan Hukum, 9(3), 201–217.
Pratama, A. Y., & Utami, S. (2022). Kesiapan struktur kelembagaan peradilan agama dalam menyongsong era peradilan elektronik modern. Jurnal Administrasi Peradilan, 4(2), 89–104.
Ramadhan, M. F. (2023). Aksesibilitas pro se parties dalam sistem administrasi e-court: Hambatan literasi teknologi pada masyarakat marginal. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 11(2), 143–159.
Rumadan, I. (2017). Peran Lembaga Peradilan Sebagai Institusi Penegak Hukum Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Bagi Terwujudnya Perdamaian. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(1), 65-81.
Saraswati, N. L. (2025). Redefinisi peran posbakum sebagai inkubator literasi hukum siber di pengadilan agama tingkat pertama. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Hukum Publik, 7(1), 33–49.
Soekanto, S. (2012). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Wahyudi, T. (2024). Budaya hukum masyarakat tradisional terhadap reformasi hukum peradilan elektronik di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Hukum, 15(4), 310–326.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Syukri, Gasim Yamani, Sahran Raden, Theo Alif Wahyu Sabubu (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
