Evaluasi Redesain Antarmuka SIPP Berbasis SUS dan Figma terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna (Studi Kasus pada Salah Satu Pengadilan Negeri 1B)

Authors

  • Sultan Zathnani Tubagus Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer (STMIK IM) Author
  • Novi Rukhviyanti Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer (STMIK IM) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62710/7phty942

Keywords:

SIPP; System Usability Scale; User Experience; Design Thinking; Figma; Interface Redesign;

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the usability level of the Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara (SIPP) interface, systematically identify interface problems, and redesign the interface based on user experience using Figma with the Design Thinking framework. The research employed a mixed methods approach that integrated quantitative measurement through the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire involving 110 active users, as well as qualitative analysis through observations and in-depth interviews. The results showed that the average SUS score was 70.09, which falls into the OK category, Grade C, and Acceptable level. However, several aspects still require improvement, particularly in the initial user adaptation stage. Item analysis indicated that learnability was the system’s main strength, while the need for initial adaptation became its primary weakness. Data triangulation identified five priority issues, namely menu navigation, search features, visual appearance, system speed, and the availability of contextual guidance. Based on these findings, a redesign process was carried out, resulting in an interactive high-fidelity prototype as a more user-oriented solution. This study is expected to provide practical contributions to improving the quality of digital administrative services in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, I. (2024). Penerapan System Usability Scale dalam pengukuran kebergunaan website SMKN 13 Bandung. INTERNAL (Information System Journal), 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.32627/internal.v7i1.865

Ansori, S., Hendradi, P., & Nugroho, S. (2023). Penerapan metode Design Thinking dalam perancangan UI/UX aplikasi mobile SIPROPMAWA. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 4(4), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v4i4.3648

Badilum (Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum). (2014). Surat Edaran Nomor: 3/DJU/HM.02.3/6/2014 tentang Administrasi Pengadilan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Mahkamah Agung RI.

Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. Dalam P. W. Jordan et al. (Ed.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (hlm. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.

Clark, N., Dabkowski, M., Driscoll, P. J., Kennedy, D., Kloo, I., & Shi, H. (2021). Empirical decision rules for improving the uncertainty reporting of small sample System Usability Scale scores. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(13), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1870831

Fiandhika, M. F., & Kelana, B. (2024). System Usability Scale validation from the expert perspective. E3S Web of Conferences, 483, 03008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448303008

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Hartina, R. (2022). Penerapan kerangka kerja design thinking pada perancangan UI/UX sistem informasi. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 15(2), 55–64.

Ibrahim, A., Alexander, O. R., Tania, K. D., Putra, P., & Meiriza, A. (2023). Assessing user experience and usability in the OVO application using UEQ and SUS. Jurnal RESTI, 7(4), 953–962. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v7i4.5137

ISO. (1998). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) — Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Organization for Standardization.

Kesuma, D. P. (2021). Using System Usability Scale method to measure usability aspects on online learning media at XYZ University. JATISI, 8(3), 1615–1626. https://doi.org/10.35957/jatisi.v8i3.1356

Lewis, J. R. (2018). The System Usability Scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307

Muhyidin, M. A., Sulhan, M. A., & Sevtiana, A. (2020). Perancangan UI/UX aplikasi My CIC menggunakan aplikasi Figma. Jurnal Digit, 10(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.51920/jd.v10i2.171

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Rukhviyanti, N., et al. (2025). The Role of Information Systems in Managing Student Report Card and Attendance Data in Junior High Schools. Journal of Innovation and Global Enterprise, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v7i1.5211

Rukhviyanti, N., & Hermawan, A. (2025). Design and Implementation of E-Government Applications to Improve Public Service Efficiency in Margahayu District. Journal of Information System and Society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i1.985

Rukhviyanti, N., et al. (2026). Pipeline NLP End-to-End untuk Peringkasan Abstraktif dan Ekstraksi Entitas Berita Berbahasa Indonesia Berbasis Model Transformer. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.30591/jpit.v11i1.10030

Sauro, J. (2011). A practical guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, benchmarks & best practices. Measuring Usability LLC.

Senubekti, M. A., Dajoreyta, G. L., & Anggraini, N. (2024). Pembuatan desain UI/UX dengan metode prototyping pada aplikasi layanan Pengadilan Negeri Bale Bandung menggunakan Figma. Jurnal Informatika Terpadu, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54914/jit.v10i1.1001

Sharfina, Z., & Santoso, H. B. (2016). An Indonesian adaptation of the System Usability Scale (SUS). Proceedings of 2016 ICACSIS, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS.2016.7872776

Shazita, N. A., Yunianto, I., & Sholikhan, M. (2025). Evaluasi redesign website berbasis Figma terhadap kepuasan pengguna (studi kasus pada BBPMP Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer Grafis, 18(2), 33–41.

Shishah, W. (2021). Usability perceptions of the Madrasati platform by teachers in Saudi Arabian schools. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0120839

Surianto, D. F., et al. (2023). PKM pelatihan Figma untuk desain prototipe sistem informasi. Vokatek Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.61255/vokatekjpm.v1i2.88

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Sultan Zathnani Tubagus, & Rukhviyanti, N. (2026). Evaluasi Redesain Antarmuka SIPP Berbasis SUS dan Figma terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna (Studi Kasus pada Salah Satu Pengadilan Negeri 1B). Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian, 3(2), 987-1002. https://doi.org/10.62710/7phty942