Analisis Keberterimaan Guru Sekolah Dasar terhadap Media Pembelajaran Multimodalitas Berbasis Google Sites pada Materi Mengenal Peta Menggunakan System Usability Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/t043b480Keywords:
Open-Ended, Pre-Assessment, Elementary Science, Pre-Assessment;Abstract
Understanding students’ initial conceptions is a crucial step in designing effective science instruction at the elementary level. This study aims to analyze students’ initial understanding of elementary science concepts through the use of open-ended pre-assessment instruments. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed involving 29 fifth-grade students at an Sekolah Dasar Negeri Hegarmanah 1 Jatinangor . Data were collected through an open-ended pre-assessment administered prior to instruction on the topic “Why Does the Earth Change?”. The instrument consisted of five open-ended questions designed to elicit students’ conceptual understanding, reasoning patterns, and potential misconceptions. Students’ responses were evaluated using an analytic scoring rubric and analyzed using descriptive statistics, including mean, median, standard deviation, and percentage distribution across readiness categories. The findings indicate that the average scores were centered around the middle level, suggesting that most students possessed basic prior knowledge, although their understanding was not yet well developed. The distribution of scores revealed heterogeneous levels of readiness, with students classified into high, middle, and low initial understanding categories. These results highlight the effectiveness of open-ended pre-assessment in revealing variations in students’ prior knowledge and misconceptions, and underscore the importance of using pre-assessment data to support differentiated and adaptive science instruction in elementary classrooms.
Downloads
References
Brookhart, S. M. (2018). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Bybee, R. W. (2018). STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2021). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
diSessa, A. A. (2017). Conceptual change in a microcosm: Comparative learning analysis of a learning event. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 1–25.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Heritage, M. (2018). Formative assessment in practice: A process of inquiry and action. Harvard Education Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2017). Science and engineering for grades K–12. National Academies Press.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Learning during disruption. OECD Publishing.
Osborne, J. (2016). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(2), 177–196.
Schleicher, A. (2021). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Vosniadou, S. (2019). The development of students’ understanding of science. Routledge.
Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lilah Karmilah, Yunus Abidin (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







