Internalizing Character Values in the Midst of the Toxic Communication Phenomenon in Adolescent Digital Interaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/bnp41q64Keywords:
Internalization of Character Values; Toxic Communication; Adolescent Digital Interaction; Digital Character Education; Digital Citizenship; Peri-Urban ContextAbstract
The phenomenon of toxic communication in adolescents' digital interactions, such as cyberbullying, hate speech, and covert verbal aggression is a serious challenge to strengthening character education in the digital era. This study aims to analyze the process of internalizing character values in the midst of the rampant toxic communication in adolescents in the peri-urban area of Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra, which borders the city of Medan. The research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 24 junior high and high school adolescents, 6 teachers, and 5 parents, complemented by digital interaction observation and targeted group discussions (FGD). The analysis was carried out using thematic analysis with stages of data reduction, categorization, and reflective interpretation. The results showed that toxic communication was normalized through a culture of sarcastic humor, peer pressure, and the reproduction of communication patterns from social media. However, the internalization of character values, including empathy, digital responsibility, respect, and self-control is formed through three main mechanisms: dialogical family mediation, school-based character education integration, and the practice of collective reflection between peers. Consistency of strengthening values in the family and school environment has been shown to increase critical awareness and the ability to regulate adolescents' emotions in responding to toxic communication. This research contributes to the development of the study of digital character education by placing the internalization of values as a social process influenced by the structure of relationships and local digital culture, as well as emphasizing the importance of a cross-environmental collaborative approach in building ethical and resilient digital citizenship.
Downloads
References
Abdul-Jabbar, S. S. (2022). Data analytics and techniques: a review. ARO-The Scientific Journal of Koya University, 10(2), 45–55.
Amar, A. (2025). Etika dan filsafat komunikasi.
Beres, N. A., Frommel, J., Reid, E., Mandryk, R. L., & Klarkowski, M. (2021). Don’t you know that you’re toxic: Normalization of toxicity in online gaming. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15.
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy-What do young people need to know
about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(Jubileumsnummer), 21–35.
Burr, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). The ethics of digital well-being: A thematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2313–2343.
Çakar-Mengü, S., & Mengü, M. (2023). Cyberbullying as a manifestation of violence on social media. Multidisciplinary Perspectives In Educational And Social Sciences Vi, 47.
Christiawan, P. I., & Nguyen, T. P. L. (2024). Re-framing the interlinked between demographic transition and land-use change in developing countries peri-urbanization. The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 56(3), 344–356.
Dewi, E. R., & Alam, A. A. (2020). Transformation model for character education of students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1228–1237.
Hua, T. K., So’od, S. M. M., & Hamid, B. A. (2019). Communicating insults in cyberbullying. Journal of Media and Communication Research, 11(3), 91–109.
Irmayanti, N., & Chusniyah, T. (2024). Empathy in the digital age: the role of self-control and social control in addressing cyberviolence. Bisma The Journal of Counseling, 8(2), 144–152.
Khan, N. I. (2019). Case study as a method of qualitative research. In Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis (pp. 170–196). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Kusumaningtyas, I. M., Asmaroini, A. P., Sunarto, S., & Hudijono, S. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Instagram Use on Adolescents’ Global Diversity Values: A Case Study of Toxic Relationship in Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5585–5599.
Low, D. E. (2024). Transgressive humor in classrooms: Punching up, punching down, and critical literacy practices. Routledge.
Meates, J. (2020). Problematic Digital Technology Use of Children and Adolescents: Psychological Impact. Teachers and Curriculum, 20(1), 51–62.
Muthiah, P., Naidu, R. S., Badzis, M., Nayan, N. F. M., Rahim, R. A., & Aziz, N. H. A. (2020). Qualitative Research: Data Collection and Data Analysis Techniques-(UUM Press). UUM press.
Nuresa, D. (2025). Ketika like dan share menjadi mata uang sosial di era digital. Journal of Mandalika Social Science, 3(1), 29–39.
Sinurat, D. A., Aulia, D. N., & Marpaung, B. O. Y. (2021). The physical factors affected settlement preferences in peri-urban area of Medan City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 780(1), 12002.
Sukmawati, S. (2023). Development of quality instruments and data collection techniques. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGuseda), 6(1), 119–124.
Surya, I. B., & Taibe, P. (2022). Transormasi Spasial dan Perubahan Sosial Komunitas Lokal: Perspektif Dinamika Pembangunan Kawasan Kota Baru. Chakti Pustaka Indonesia.
Viera, C. A. (2023). Case study as a qualitative research methodology. Performance Improvement Journal, 62(4), 125–129.
Warini, S., Hidayat, Y. N., & Ilmi, D. (2023). Teori belajar sosial dalam pembelajaran.
ANTHOR: Education and Learning Journal, 2(4), 566–576.
Yeasmin, F. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on society: unraveling trends, challenges, and opportunities. Eunomia–Rozwój Zrównoważony–Sustainable Development, 2 (108, 53–67.
Zalukhu, A. (2025). The Christian Education Approach In Guiding The Digital Generation To Address Social Media And Toxic Behavior. The Way: Jurnal Teologi Dan Kependidikan, 11(1), 39–57.
Zatrahadi, M. F. (2025). Mengikuti Arus; Mengapa Kita Mudah Terpengaruh Tren Dan Opini Orang Lain. Nas Media Pustaka.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Effiati Juliana Hasibuan, Nurrahmi Lasahido (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
