Kalurahan Incentive Fund in Bantul Regency: A Governmentality Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/mdpr3e58Keywords:
Government Policy, Village Insentive Fund, Governmentality, Technocratic.Abstract
Bantul Regency, Yogyakarta implemented the Dana Insentif Kalurahan (DIKal) policy inspired by the Dana Insentif Daerah (DID) policy, which is given by the central government to districts/cities with the best performance assessment. Each villages must get the required performance criteria, and the village with the best performance will received DIKal as a reward. In 2022, from 75 villages in Bantul, only 7 villages received DIKal and in 2023, this increased to 31 villages that received it, with tiered incentive amounts. Even though village received DIKal in a very competitive ways, village cannot freely used these incentives because they must still refer to the district regulations. The aim of this research is to find out how DIKal policies implemented and seen from a governmentality perspective. This research used a qualitative method with an interpretative approached. The results of this research that the DIKal policies implemented in a technocratic way even though the assessment stage is packaged with a democratic model because an independent assessment stage by villages with a score weighting up to 80%. The enthusiasm of villages government in implemented DIKal policies varies greatly. For village that have orderly administration, DIKal policy is joyfull welcomed because it can increased village income. For village that lack order in administration, DIKal is interpreted as a burden because they must completed so many documents. Meanwhile, for village that already have high village income, incentive rewards are no longer an attraction, and DIKal is interpreted only as a mandatory that must be implemented.
Downloads
References
Akbal, M. (2016). Harmonisasi Kewenangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah dalam Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Supremasi, XI nomer 2(2 Oktober 2016), 99–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/supremasi.v11i2.2800
Haryono, S. (2023). 31 Kalurahan di Kabupaten Bantul Dapat Dana Insentif Kalurahan Rp2,6 Miliar. Timesindonesia.Co.Id.
Hidayat, T. (2022). Beri Kinerja Terbaik, 7 Kalurahan Dapat Dana Insentif dari Pemkab Bantul. Timesindonesia.Co.Id.
Huda, N. (2010). Problematika Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah. FH UII Press.
humas Kabupaten Bantul. (2022). Dana Intensif Kalurahan Digulirkan, Pemkab Bantul Gelar Sosialisasi. Bantulkab.Go.Id.
Humas Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. (2023). Pelaksanaan Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia.
Jessen, M. H., & Eggers, N. von. (2020). Governmentality and Statification: Towards a Foucauldian Theory of the State. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419849099
Nadir, S. (2013). Otonomi Daerah dan Desentralisasi Desa Menuju Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 1(1), 9.
Pambudi, A. S., Manalu, G. S. L., & Deni. (2022). Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Dana Insentif Daerah Berbasis Penghargaan Pembangunan Daerah pada Provinsi Jawa Tengah, Bengkulu, dan Jawa Timur. Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan, Vol. 5(No, 2), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33701/jkp.v5i2.2679
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 140/ PMK.07/2022 (2022). PKDOD LAN. (2016). Hubungan Kewenangan antara Pemerintah Provinsi, Pemerintah
Kabupaten/Kota, dan Pemerintah Desa dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa (R. Nurjaman (ed.)). PKDOD LAN.
Rasyid, S. B. A., & Pribadi, U. (2021). Implikasi Reformasi Birokrasi Terhadap Kepercayaan dan Kepuasan Warga di Kota Tidore Kepulauan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora (JISH), 10(no.3), 430–447. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v10i3.35375
Rauf, R. (2018). Asas Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah (Dekonsentrasi, Desentralisasi, dan Tugas Pembantunya) (S. Maulidiah (ed.); First Edit). Zanafa Publishing.
Ropii, I. (2015). Pola Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Otonomi Daerah (Konsepsi dan Dinamikanya). Maksigama : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang, 9(no.1), 39–59. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.37303/.v9i1.4
Sahdan, G. (2020). Membongkar Selubung Ideologi Ilmu Pemerintahan: Perspektif Governmentality. GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta), 1(1), 41–57.
Simanjuntak, K. M. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 7(2), 111.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (25th ed.). Susanto, S. N. H. (2019). Desentralisasi Asimetris dalam Konteks Negara Kesatuan.
Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal, 2(4), 631–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.631-639
Synta, & Nurhazana. (2021). Efektivitas Dana Insentif Daerah dalam Mendukung Pencapaian Kinerja Tertentu di Kabupaten Bengkalis. Jurna IAKP, Vol.2(No. 2), 150–158.
Tyas, B. H. S., Winarti, S. E., Raharjo, T. P., & Puspitasari, C. (2022). Politik Anggaran Belanja Desa Masa Pandemi di Kalurahan Sumbermulyo, Bambanglipuro, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Agregasi, 10, No.1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.34010/agregasi.v10i1.5746
Tyas, B. H. S., Winarti, S. E., Raharjo, T. P., & Puspitasari, C. (2023). Belenggu Desa Mewujudkan Prioritas Daerah: Relasi Pemerintah Kalurahan dan Supradesa dalam Sinkronisasi Program di Kalurahan Sumbermulyo, Bantul. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja, Vol. 49(No. 2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.33701/jipwp.v49i2.3653
Vela, J. A. C., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and village governance in Indonesia: the return to the nagari and the 2014 Village Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493–507.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Condrodewi Puspitasari, Hari Saptaning Tyas, Analius Giawa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
