Psychological Safety as a Driver of Employee Voice: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/7p6qsm90Keywords:
Psychological Safety, Employee Voice, Organizational Behavior, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
This study aims to regularly examine the relationship between psychological safety and employee voice in an organizational context. This study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following PRISMA guidelines. Literature was retrieved from the Scopus database using keywords related to psychological safety and employee voice. Based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 peer-reviewed quantitative empirical articles published between 2019 and 2025 were selected. The selected studies were analyzed using narrative and thematic synthesis to identify patterns, roles, and relationships between variables. The findings indicate that psychological safety consistently has a positive influence on employee voice across various organizational environments and cultures. Psychological safety primarily serves as a mediator linking leadership style, organizational systems, and social relationships with employee voice. Several studies also identified psychological safety as a moderator that strengthens or weakens the effectiveness of organizational practices in encouraging employee voice. Employees are more likely to voice ideas, suggestions, and concerns when they perceive a psychologically safe work environment. This study is limited to a single database (Scopus) and focuses only on quantitative empirical studies, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. This study contributes to the literature on organizational behavior and human resource management by synthesizing empirical evidence on the role of psychological safety in promoting employee voice and offering practical implications for organizational leadership. Its novelty lies in regularly mapping psychological safety as a mediator and moderator in the employee voice literature.
Downloads
References
Jabbar, A. J., Haider, S., & Usman Qureshi, M. (2023). Moderated mediation between high performance work systems (hpws) and employee voice behavior: The role of psychological safety and supportive leadership. Revista de Psicologia Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 39(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.5093/JWOP2023A15
Boxall, P. F., Purcell, J., & Wright, P. M. (2007). The oxford handbook of human resource management. Oxford University Press.
Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Morrison, R. L. (2018). Give and take: Needed updates to social exchange theory. In Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 493–498). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.101
Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management 16th edition.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Fatoki, O. (2024). Inclusive leadership and employee voice behaviour: Serial mediating effects of psychological safety and affective commitment. Administrative Sciences,
(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090199
Hu, Y., Zhu, L., Zhou, M., Li, J., Maguire, P., Sun, H., & Wang, D. (2018). Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: How leader-member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowerment influence employees’ willingness to Speak Out. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(SEP). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01718
Khan, J., Jaafar, M., Javed, B., Mubarak, N., & Saudagar, T. (2020). Does inclusive leadership affect project success? The mediating role of perceived psychological empowerment and psychological safety. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-
Kolbe, M., Eppich, W., Rudolph, J., Meguerdichian, M., Catena, H., Cripps, A., Grant, V., & Cheng, A. (2020). Managing psychological safety in debriefings: A dynamic balancing act. In BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 164–171). BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470
Lee, J., Loretta Kim, S., & Yun, S. (2023). Encouraging employee voice: Coworker knowledge sharing, psychological safety, and promotion focus. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(5), 1044–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.2018014
Li, J., Xia, Y., Ji, C., & Li, H. (2024). How does leader emotional labor influence employee voice: The mediating roles of psychological safety and perceived voice efficacy. Chinese Management Studies, 18(6), 1898–1917. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2023-0302
Malik, A. (2018). Springer Texts in Business and economics strategic human resource management and employment eelations na international perspective. http://www.springer.com/series/10099
Meng, D., & Yang, J. (2022). Pleasant music and voice behavior in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Social Behavior and Personality, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.11105
Miao, R., Lu, L., Cao, Y., & Du, Q. (2020). The high-performance work system, employee voice, and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041150
Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
Ononye, U. H., & Maduemezia, I. (2024). Knowledge-oriented leadership, psychological safety, employee voice, and innovation. Informing Science, 27. https://doi.org/10.28945/5244
Potipiroon, W., & Ford, M. T. (2021). Does leader humor influence employee voice? The mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of team humor. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 28(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211036464
Subhakaran, S. E., & Dyaram, L. (2018). Interpersonal antecedents to employee upward voice: Mediating role of psychological safety. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1510–1525. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2017-0276
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. In Source: MIS Quarterly (Vol. 27, Issue 1).
Tian, X., Chae, H., Song, D., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Leader prohibitive voice shapes employee voice through psychological safety moderated by self-efficacy and generational differences. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17500-5
Torringtion, D., Hall, L., Taylor, S., & Atkinson, C. (2014). Human resource management ninth edition. www.pearson-books.com
Xu, M., Qin, X., Dust, S. B., & DiRenzo, M. S. (2019). Supervisor-subordinate proactive personality congruence and psychological safety: A signaling theory approach to employee voice behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.03.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Irfan Akbar, Fiona Niska Dinda Nadia (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
