Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Dukungan Kelembagaan Desa terhadap Kinerja BUM Desa Melalui Kapabilitas Inovasi di Provinsi Jawa Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/j0en4c50Keywords:
BUM Desa performance, innovation capability, leadership style, village institutional supportAbstract
This study explores how leadership style and village institutional support contribute to the performance of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUM Desa), with innovation capability acting as a mediating mechanism in West Java. The research is grounded in the observed decline in BUM Desa performance rankings during the 2023–2024 period, which signals persistent limitations in sustaining and improving long-term BUM Desa performance. Existing empirical studies indicate that the performance of BUM Desa is closely linked to internal organizational dynamics, particularly leadership effectiveness, institutional arrangements at the village level, and the capacity to foster innovation. To empirically investigate these relationships, this study employs a quantitative approach with a causal explanatory design. Survey data were collected from 540 employees of legally established BUM Desa in West Java, with the sample size determined using the Slovin formula. The data were obtained through a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale and analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 3. The findings reveal that leadership style and village institutional support have a positive and statistically significant effect on BUM Desa performance. In addition, innovation capability directly enhances BUM Desa performance and partially mediates the effects of leadership style and institutional support on performance outcomes. These results underscore the strategic role of innovation capability as a key pathway through which leadership and institutional support translate into improved BUM Desa performance. Consequently, efforts to strengthen BUM Desa performance in West Java should prioritize the development of effective leadership practices and consistent institutional support to reinforce innovation capability and promote sustainable BUM Desa performance
Downloads
References
Aboramadan, M. S., Kundi, A., & Obeidat, R. F. (2025). Leadership and firm performance: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 75(1), 1–33.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2020). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 483–530.
Chaudhuri, A., Kumar, V., & Kumar, A. (2024). Institutional support, innovation capability, and firm performance in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 165, 113985.
Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127–142.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Handayani, P., Santoso, B., & Lestari, D. (2022). Innovation capabilities and performance of village-owned enterprises in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan,
(3), 215–230.
House, R. J. (1996). Path–goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352.
Nguyen, T. T. H., Pham, T. T. T., & Nguyen, N. T. (2023). Leadership behavior, innovation capability, and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100357.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.
Pratiwi, S., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Institutional support and performance of village-owned enterprises: Evidence from rural Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 10(2), 145– 158.
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.
Vargas, M. I. R., Lloria, M. B., & Roig-Dobón, S. (2023). Leadership, innovation capability, and organizational performance. European Management Journal, 41(2), 241–252. Widiastuti, R., Santika, P., & Rahman, F. (2023). The role of local government engagement in enhancing village-owned enterprise performance. Jurnal Ekonomi dan
Pembangunan Desa, 11(1), 33–49.
Wójcik, P., Ciszewska-Mlinarič, M., & Obloj, K. (2022). Innovation capabilities and performance in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1080– 1092.
Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia. (2023). Keputusan Menteri Desa PDTT Nomor 7 Tahun 2023 tentang Pemeringkatan BUM Desa.
Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia. (2024). Keputusan Menteri Desa PDTT Nomor 177 Tahun 2024 tentang Pemeringkatan BUM Desa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Siti Nurmu’minah Fitriah, Wachyu Hari Haji (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
