Social Perception of Watershed Degradation and Its Influence on Collective Conservation Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/1mctvx97Keywords:
Social Perception, Watershed Degradation, Collective Conservation Behavior, Post-Disaster Community, DAS Rongkong.Abstract
The Rongkong Watershed (DAS) in North Luwu Regency is a strategic area in flash flood control, but it also represents a space of ecological and social trauma after the 2020 flash flood event. Until now, the management of the Rongkong watershed has tended to be dominated by technical and structural approaches, such as the construction of dams, hydrological monitoring stations, and the reforestation of critical land, while the social dimension of community perception and collective conservation behavior has not been the main focus. This study aims to analyze the social perception of the community towards the degradation of the Rongkong watershed and its influence on the formation of collective conservation behavior after the disaster. The study used a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving 12 key informants who were purposively selected from the upstream, middle, and downstream watersheds. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation, then analyzed using thematic analysis. The results show that the direct experience of flash floods shapes diverse social perceptions, ranging from reflective perceptions that view watershed degradation as a shared ecological threat to passive perceptions that place disasters as external phenomena. Reflective perceptions tend to encourage community participation in collective conservation activities, such as reforestation and environmental mutual cooperation, while passive perceptions underscore social engagement and reliance on structural interventions. This study concludes that the effectiveness of watershed management is not only determined by technical solutions, but is greatly influenced by how communities interpret watershed degradation and its social role in conservation efforts, so that the integration of social perception dimensions is key in community-based sustainable watershed management.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479.
Alemu, M. M. (2022). Human Activity, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas. Springer.
Basuki, T. M., Nugroho, H. Y. S. H., Indrajaya, Y., Pramono, I. B., Nugroho, N. P., Supangat,
A. B., Indrawati, D. R., Savitri, E., Wahyuningrum, N., & Purwanto. (2022). Improvement of integrated watershed management in Indonesia for mitigation and adaptation to climate change: A review. Sustainability, 14(16), 9997.
Constantino, S. M., Schlüter, M., Weber, E. U., & Wijermans, N. (2021). Cognition and behavior in context: a framework and theories to explain natural resource use decisions in social-ecological systems. Sustainability Science, 16(5), 1651–1671.
Cotler, H., Cuevas, M. L., Landa, R., & Frausto, J. M. (2022). Environmental governance in urban watersheds: the role of civil society organizations in Mexico. Sustainability, 14(2), 988.
Dhungana, N., Lee, C.-H., & Gentle, P. (2025). Assessing mountain communities’ willingness to adaptation strategies for watershed management in changing climate. Climatic Change, 178(8), 151.
Diakakis, M., Skordoulis, M., & Savvidou, E. (2021). The relationships between public risk perceptions of climate change, environmental sensitivity and experience of extreme weather-related disasters: Evidence from Greece. Water, 13(20), 2842.
Eaton, W. M., Brasier, K. J., Burbach, M. E., Whitmer, W., Engle, E. W., Burnham, M., Quimby, B., Kumar Chaudhary, A., Whitley, H., & Delozier, J. (2021). A conceptual framework for social, behavioral, and environmental change through stakeholder engagement in water resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 34(8), 1111–1132.
Féaux de la Croix, J., & Samakov, A. (2024). Moving beyond the Framing Impasse in the Aral Sea Delta: Vernacular Knowledge of Salinization and Its Potential for Social Learning towards Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(19), 8605.
Haase, P., Cortés-Guzmán, D., He, F., Jupke, J. F., Mangadze, T., Pelicice, F. M., Palmer,
M. A., Rolls, R. J., Schäfer, R. B., & Welti, E. A. R. (2025). Successes and failures of conservation actions to halt global river biodiversity loss. Nature Reviews Biodiversity, 1(2), 104–118.
Herzog, L., Tanguay, L., Beisner, B. E., Pahl-Wostl, C., Audet, R., & Schlüter, M. (2022). Studying human-nature relations in aquatic social-ecological systems using the social-ecological action situations framework: how to move from empirical data to conceptual models. Ecology and Society, 27(3).
Kraiwanit, T., Limna, P., & Siripipatthanakul, S. (2023). NVivo for social sciences and management studies: A systematic review. Advance Knowledge for Executives, 2(3), 1–11.
Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
Manaf, M., Muhibuddin, A., Suriandjo, H. S., Muspida, A., Widodo, S., & Abdulbar, F. (2022). Mitigation and public coordination for flood disaster risk reduction (FDRR) in the implementation of North Luwu sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1109(1), 12018.
Muzari, T., Shava, G. N., & Shonhiwa, S. (2022). Qualitative research paradigm, a key research design for educational researchers, processes and procedures: A theoretical overview. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 14–20.
Paski, J. A. I., Makmur, E. E. S., Permana, D. S., Nurrahmat, M. H., Praja, A. S., Riama, N. F., & Fitria, W. (2021). Analysis of Multi-Scale Hydrometeorological Triggering Flash Flood Event of the 13 July 2020 in North Luwu, South Sulawesi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 893(1), 12014.
Perkasa, H. W., Nurfatriani, F., & Astana, S. (2021). Analysis of soil and water conservation practices by community throughout the Upper Citarum River Watershed: motivational, technical and institutional aspects. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 917(1), 12006.
Phyoe, S. S. S., Htay, T., Thant, Z. M., Kyaw, H. Y., San, K. N., Tun, Z. P. H., Ranke, P. S., & Røskaft, E. (2023). Exploring Community Perceptions and Attitudes toward Protected Areas in Myanmar: The Role of Socio-Spatial Factors in Conservation Support. Human Ecology, 51(6), 1189–1203.
Rao, N., & Power, S. A. (2021). “Communities change when individuals change”: The sustainability of system-challenging collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 525–537.
Ruano-Chamorro, C., Gurney, G. G., & Cinner, J. E. (2022). Advancing procedural justice in conservation. Conservation Letters, 15(3), e12861.
Shunglu, R., Köpke, S., Kanoi, L., Nissanka, T. S., Withanachchi, C. R., Gamage, D. U., Dissanayake, H. R., Kibaroglu, A., Ünver, O., & Withanachchi, S. S. (2022). Barriers in participative water Governance: A critical analysis of community development approaches. Water, 14(5), 762.
Sugianto, Y. D. M. W. (2021). Integrating Nature-Based Solutions (NBs) for Sustainable Urban Development and Climate Resilience in Indonesia’s Citarum River Watershed.
Thomas, G. (2021). How to do your case study.
Zerga, B. (2025). Integrated watershed management: a review. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 657.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asikin Muchtar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
