Perluasan Tanggung Jawab Pencipta dan Pengguna Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62710/rjgd0b98Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Legal Liability, Philosophy of LawAbstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant transformation across various sectors of life, while simultaneously introducing new legal complexities, particularly concerning liability for damages caused by AI-based systems. Within the framework of Indonesian positive law, AI is still positioned as a legal object functioning as part of an electronic system or agent, and therefore does not possess the capacity to act as an independent legal subject. Consequently, legal liability remains attributed to human actors, namely developers and users. This study aims to analyze the construction of legal liability for AI developers and users under Indonesian positive law, as well as to formulate an expanded model of liability from the perspective of legal philosophy in order to achieve a balance between victim protection, justice, and technological innovation. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, analyzed qualitatively through deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that fault-based liability remains the dominant paradigm; however, it faces significant limitations in addressing the autonomous and black box characteristics of AI, which complicate the establishment of causality. Therefore, it is necessary to develop more adaptive liability models, such as strict liability, shared liability, and hybrid liability, supported by philosophical foundations including utilitarianism, deontology, and distributive justice. In addition, strengthening the principles of transparency (explainability), due diligence, and collective responsibility mechanisms is crucial in addressing the emerging responsibility gap. In conclusion, a comprehensive reformulation of legal regulation grounded in the values of social justice is urgently required to ensure that the development of AI remains aligned with the principles of legal certainty and the protection of human rights.
Downloads
References
Abbott, R. (2018). The reasonable computer: Disrupting the paradigm of tort liability. The George Washington Law Review, 86, 1.
Afrilia, D., & Sulistyaningrum, H. P. (2017). Implementasi Prinsip Strict Liability (Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Mutlak) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen. Simbur Cahaya, 4949–4960.
Amelia, Y. F., Kaimuddin, A., & Ashsyarofi, H. L. (2024). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TERHADAP KORBAN PENYALAHGUNAAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DEEPFAKE MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 30(1), 9675–9691.
Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2020). Strategi Nasional Kecerdasan Artifisial Indonesia 2020 - 2045. Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Budiardjo, M. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Fuller, L. L. (1964). The Morality of Law. Yale University Press.
Guadamuz, A. (2020). Do Androids Dream of Electric Copyright? Comparative Analysis of Originality in Artificial Intelligence Generated Works. Intellectual Property Quarterly. https://doi.org/https://ssrn.com/abstract=2981304
Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The Concept of Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Jamaaluddin, & Sulistyowati, I. (2022). Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence). Umsida Press.
Kiemas, A., Matheus, J., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Redefining Bankruptcy Law: Incorporating the Principle of Business Continuity for Fair Debt Resolution. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.996
Kusumawardani, Q. D. (2019). HUKUM PROGRESIF DAN PERKEMBANGAN TEKNOLOGI KECERDASAN BUATAN. Veritas et Justitia, 5(1), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v5i1.3270
Marchant, G. E., & Wallach, W. (2013). Governing the Governance of Emerging Technologies. In Innovative Governance Models for Emerging Technologies. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545644.00013
Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (19th ed.). Prenada Media Group.
Matheus, J., & Gunadi, A. (2024). Pembentukan Lembaga Pengawas Perlindungan Data Pribadi Di Era Ekonomi Digital: Kajian Perbandingan Dengan KPPU. JUSTISI, 10(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v10i1.2757
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son & Bourn.
Prabowo, H., Azwar, A., & Kuswanti, A. (2026). Analisis Kritis Gerakan Nasional Budaya Sensor Mandiri dengan Perspektif Deontologi Immanuel Kant. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 8(2), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v8i2.1971
Prianto, Y., Sumantri, V. K., & Sasmita, P. Y. (2020). Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject. Proceedings of the Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200515.067
Purwaningsih, E., & Islami, I. (2023). ANALISIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI ) SEBAGAI INVENTOR BERDASARKAN HUKUM PATEN DAN HUKUM ISLAM. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v11i1.8915
Selbst, A. D. (2021). An Institutional View of Algorithmic Impact Assessments. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 35(1).
Shamov, O. A. (2025). The «Black box» problem in legal AI: Are existing XAI methods sufficient to meet due process requirements? Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 3(90), 433–437. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.90.3.63
Widayati, L. S. (2011). Perluasan Asas Legalitas dalam RUU KHUP. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 2(2), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v2i2.219
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Evellyn Octavia, Jeffaldo Thio, Sabrina Audelia, Yuwono Prianto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
